
It has been an encouraging trend. After several months during which we observed a score of painful defections from our church, the past few months have seen a rebound. We have been blessed to see a number of new folks join our fellowship. Among them are a handful of mature transplants, Christians new to our area, who bring with them a measure of much appreciated stability. But maybe even more exciting is the number of those who had been previously un-churched. These folks add something refreshing. They are a reminder of an important aspect of what we are about – or at least what we should be about as the church of Jesus Christ in our community. I want us to be a church that sees growth primarily through conversion, and by assimilating the formerly un-churched and de-churched, not growth by enticing the transient hoppers to come from whatever pews they are presently adorning.
I use the term “un-churched” intentionally. I know it has been common in the past to refer to reaching the “lost” – something I agree is important. I also realize that this shift to reach the “un-churched” has caused a bit of concern to some who fear that this is somehow a compromise of our evangelistic mandate. But this is no compromise.
Our forefathers in the Faith long asserted that “ordinarily there is no salvation apart from the church”. The word “ordinarily” is important, because it admits that there are circumstances where men and women are legitimately regenerated and converted and yet, for whatever the reasons, are not a part of any visible expression of the Body of Christ. But the word ordinarily also conveys that this situation ought to be highly unusual. Implied in this expression is that whenever someone is not a part of a visible church, genuine Believer or not, there is reason to assume that they are not Christians. This is not judgment. It is simply a rational assumption based on evidence and what scripture declares to be the expected norm.
What I appreciate about this position is the simplicity. Rather than attempting to discern which of the un-churched are Christians and which are among the “lost” – a task that is essentially near impossible, since I cannot see into each heart as God does – instead assume all are in need of grace. My role, and our role as the church, is simply to express the gospel to them through both Word & Deed, and encourage them to unite with some faithful congregation – hopefully many of them to ours. In the region where we live (Appalachia), where most people make some profession of being a Christian, even if many have no idea of what that actually means, it certainly clarifies our mandate for outreach and evangelism.
But with the number of un-churched friends we are now making, I am reminded of an important detail: Not all the un-churched are the same, and thus they should not all be treated exactly the same. In other words there are distinctions between the un-churched, categories or levels of their un-churchedness.

Thom Rainer, in his book The Unchurched Next Door, reveals the findings of research by the Rainer Group that is both important and helpful. Rainer observes that there are five categories, or five degrees, of un-churched:










