Why So Afraid?

Bob Newhart, in his classic comedy sketch, “Stop It!“, plays a psychologist who offers unusual therapy to his patients.  The patient in this particular sketch is a woman who expresses fear of being buried alive in a box. She laments that her fear is affecting, even debilitating, her in her day to day life – her ability to go through tunnels, to be in elevators, or even to be in other kinds of enclosed or “boxy” spaces. Newhart’s hilariously, insensitive, practical counsel: “Stop It!! You don’t want to go through life being scared of being buried alive in a box, do you? I mean, that sounds … frightening.”

Dan Allender, in The Cry of the Soul, describes fear:

Fear is like a manipulative con man, seeming like it only has your best interests at heart, but lies to us, and distorts the truth, and in the end warps our thinking, robs us of our understanding of reality.

Allender goes on to describe some of the negative effects un-checked fear can cause us in our day to day lives:

“Fear erodes our relationships with others and with God, causes us feel abandoned and alone.”

“Fear makes us focus on the worst possible outcome. It is not necessarily wrong, but it never gives us the whole picture.”

So…

The Word Snatchers

I am not alone in lamenting the foolishness and the ugliness of “cancel culture”. Expressions of “cancel culture” take many forms, from outright shunning, to virtue signaling, to quiet but pretentious attitudes of superiority and self-righteousness simply because one sees himself or herself on a particular side of a cultural issue.

Among the more foolish and frustrating consequences of the cancel culture phenomena is the misuse and abuse of certain words – words which, of themselves, are perfectly good and useful, but which for any number of reasons are hijacked from their actual meanings and used as weapons of cultural warfare.

My old friend, Randy Nabors, offers some wise words reflecting upon this unfortunate and misguided trend in a post he titled The Word Snatchers:

Watch out for the word snatchers, these thieves of beautiful and important words. They sloganize to demonize, so as to thought despise. By taking words out of context, (and context is everything) they label to divide. The tactic is simplistic so the simple minded and the gullible will hear “signal” words and assume they have met the enemy. This is propaganda so the target’s very words become weaponized against them. Remember, even the word God is a bad word in the Devil’s mouth, he refers to God often enough in his lies, but his use doesn’t make God bad or his name less than glorious.

Take a word like justice, add the word social to it (which is a bit redundant since all justice is “social” in that it is only revealed in relationship to others-between God and man, and between persons) and then associate it with causes one might despise, and you have taken one of the attributes of God and made it something to belittle and fear.

These word thieves have taken away diversity, equity, and inclusion as if they were bad words when they are in fact artifacts of love, kindness, and reconciliation. It is their context which matters, who is being included for what purpose? I speak as a Christian, I don’t want sin in the camp, I don’t want to open the door to evil, so I discriminate based on the Truth (God’s word) but not on the basis of skin color. I can be discriminatory without practicing discrimination.

These deceivers have tried to steal away our use of the word empathy. Now they seek to steal the word missional. Just associate it with liberals and it gets caught in our mouths. We become suspicious of those who use such words, we stop using the words ourselves lest we become suspect. The insidious and pharisaical word police have used social media to such powerful effect that we have failed to keep our cool under fire, we wilt under the onslaught of false associations and ad hominem arguments.

Let this storm of slanted dribble pass you by; false association is the same as slander, it is a lie. Just define what you mean, and mean what you say, and take time to think, time to listen, time to understand, time to explain. Show some grace by asking, “what do you mean by that?” instead of being guided by political presuppositions. We live in an age of demogaugic denouncing for propagandic and political posturing to belittle and thus divide, by twits who tweet. We have abandoned wisdom for the clever, and abandoned analysis for instant reaction in the name of idealogical self-protection.

It is time to have the mind of Christ, and to think, and not lose our minds.

Those Blasted Presbyterians

Around the same time, Horace Walpole spoke from the English House of Commons to report on these “extraordinary proceedings” in the colonies of the new world.  “There is no good crying about the matter,” he said.  “Cousin America has run off with the Presbyterian parson, and that is the end of it.”

The parson of which he spoke, was  John Witherspoon—a Presbyterian minister, as well as a descendant of John Knox.  At the time, Witherspoon was president of the College of New Jersey (now Princeton).  He was also the only clergyman to sign the Declaration of Independence.

From the English perspective, the American revolution was often perceived as a “Presbyterian Rebellion.”  And its supporters were often disdained as “those blasted Presbyterians.”

The Presbyterian Revolution
Most American Christians are unaware of the fact that the American Revolution, as well as the new American state, was greatly shaped by Presbyterians and the Calvinism that was at its root.  Some modern-day  Presbyterians have moved light years away from the convictions of these early colonists.

An estimated three million people lived in the colonies at the time of the Revolutionary War.  Of that number, “900,00 were of Scotch or Scotch-Irish origin, 600,000 were Puritan English, while over 400,000 were of Dutch, German Reformed and Huguenot descent. That is to say, two thirds of our Revolutionary forefathers were trained in the school of Calvin.”  (Carlson, p. 19)

As one historian puts it, “When Cornwallis was driven back to ultimate retreat and surrender at Yorktown, all of the colonels of the Colonial Army but one were Presbyterian elders. It is estimated that more than one half of all the soldiers and officers of the American Army during the Revolution were Presbyterian.” (Carlson, p. 16)

To the man, Presbyterian clergy joined the Colonialist cause. It was said that many of them led the Revolution from the pulpit.  In doing so, they paid a heavy price for their support for independence.  Many lost family members or their own lives.  Some had their churches burned to the ground.

The Presbyterian Drive
We forget that many of the early American colonists had left England precisely because Presbyterian Christianity was rejected.  After its brief reign as the established church through the English Civil War and the work of the Westminster Assembly, Britain returned to Anglicanism.  Thousands of non-conforming Presbyterian ministers were then ejected from their churches.  Some, such as the Covenanters, were martyred in a period that came to be known as “the killing times.” Rigid laws of conformity drove many to seek a better life somewhere else.  After 1660, many Presbyterians began to make their way to the colonies in North America.  It was these individuals who brought a new strength to the colonies as they inched their way forward towards independence.

They had little loyalty, and often outright hostility, to the crown of England.  They were armed with the theology of John Calvin, mediated through John Knox, and solidified during the English Civil war. It was a theology which devalued the divine right of human kings, and elevated the worth and dignity of the individual under God.  This theology shaped the early American understanding of civil liberty.

It shaped our founding fathers. The idea of human equality which influenced John Locke, who in turn,  influenced our founding fathers, was learned from the Puritans. Locke’s father had been on Cromwell’s side during the English Civil war.

It also shaped the general population under the influence of the Great Awakening. The Great Awakening was a massive 18th century religious revival that shook the colonies. It was promoted by preachers such as Gilbert Tennent and George Whitfield who travelled up and down the coast calling for a return to a robust Christian and Biblical faith.  Emphasizing the new birth and a Calvinist theology, the Great Awakening had an immense influence on colonial sentiments in the generation just preceding the American Revolution.

Consider then, some of what was at work in the American consciousness preceding the revolution. There was the memory of their horrid experience in England. There was the worry that Anglicans would establish this same kind of church in the colonies. There was a persistent fear of the imposition of bishops who were viewed as “holy monarchs,”  (monarchy in any form was considered bad)!  There was a belief in the absolute sovereignty of God. God alone is Lord of all and the author of liberty. There was a corresponding belief in the absolute equality of individuals (king and peasant, clergy and laity) under God’s law. There was the belief that no human should be entrusted with absolute power, given our radically fallen human nature.  There was a belief that there should be a separation of powers in any new government that is established.  And because of their experience in England, there was the belief that religious freedom and freedom of conscience should be respected.

In other words, for these Presbyterians, liberty is affirmed, but it is not an absolute liberty. It is always to be lived out under the sovereign creator God. It was this theology, a theology rooted, not just in Calvin, but in the Bible, which ultimately gave the colonialist the will to resist.

The Presbyterian Legacy
So this year, as we celebrate our independence once again, and as we think of early American courage, and the genius of our founding fathers, let us not forget those blasted Presbyterians who sought to understand liberty in light of the Bible.  A liberty which conceived of a nation and its entire government under God.

***

NOTE: This piece was originally written by Don Sweeting and posted on his old blog, The Chief End of Man, on July 4, 2014.

Sources:  Our Presbyterian Heritage, Paul Carlson (Elgin:  David C. Cook, 1973)Presbyterians: Their History and Beliefs, Walter L. Lingle and John W. Kuykendall, (Atlanta:  John Knox Press, 1988), The Emergence of Liberty in the Modern World, Douglas F. Kelly, (Phillipsburg, New Jersey:  P&R Publishing, 1992)

A Prayer for the Fourth of July

It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.” ~ Galatians 5.1

Lord Jesus, it’s the Fourth of July – a holiday set aside to remember and revel in the freedom we enjoy as citizens of America. As broken as she is, we’re still thankful for our country and for the privileges we enjoy.

But the gratitude we feel for our USA citizenship pales in comparison with the joy generated by our citizenship in heaven. (Philippians 3.20) We praise you today for making us members of the “chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession“. (1 Peter 2.9) This is our true and lasting identity – our consummate passport and eternal liberty.

Indeed, Jesus, only those you set free are really free. (John 8.36) You took our guilt and gave us your righteousness. We’re no longer condemned for our sin or in fear of death. Hallelujah! Sin’s dominion has been broken in our lives; never again will it be our master. (Romans 6.14) We obey you because we love you – not because of pride, pressure, or pragmatics. Holiness is beautiful, and no longer a burden.

We get to run freely and boldly to the throne of grace – into your holy presence, where we only experience your welcome and joy. We’re free to own our sin and brokenness, and to repent with joy, for you bore our shame and we don’t have to pose or pretend anymore. Three Hallelujahs, for that!

You’ve set us free from seeking fool’s gold and a fool’s reward, by making us characters in, and carriers of, your story. Our tiny fiefdoms of self have been crushed under the grace of your all-things-new kingdom. We’re now free to love others as you love us – forgiving and forbearing, encouraging and hoping. Take us WAY deeper into this particular freedom, Jesus.

By the power of the gospel, we will seek to stand firm in these and the many more freedoms you’ve won for us, until the Day you return to usher in the new heaven and new earth. So very Amen we pray, in your liberating and loving name.

***

NOTE: This prayer was originally composed by Scotty Smith for The Gospel Coalition (7/4/16)

Trusting God in the Face of Death

Two heavyweight proponents of gospel, grace, and godliness – Michael Horton and Tim Keller – discuss suffering, forgiveness, Justification through Faith, Evangelicalism (and Fundamentalism), along with a number of other topics in this thoughtful conversation between old friends. (According to Horton, this conversation was his last with Tim Keller, before Keller’s death in Spring of 2023.)

Much to chew on here. I think I’ll be watching this one again, and maybe again and again.

The Resolutions of Jonathan Edwards Categorized

The resolutions of Jonathan Edwards is a treasure trove of thoughtful godliness. The earliest of these Resolutions were penned when Edwards was still a teenager – age 19. The list was completed as Edwards was finishing his formal education and beginning his ministerial life. For the rest of Edwards’ remarkable life, part of his regular prayer and devotional practice was to go back and re-read these resolutions at least once a week. In all, there are 70 resolutions. Every one of them takes eternity into consideration and presents a very profound view of a life committed to living purposely for the glory of God as top priority.

Some time ago, I took it upon myself to re-write and post Edwards’ Resolutions in more contemporary English – hopefully with minimal dilution of Edwards’ insight and intent. That post has subsequently been viewed more times than any other on this blog. Some from other countries have even taken my meagre effort and translated that post into other languages.

Recently, I ran across Edwards’ Resolutions categorized, rather than in their original sequence. The categorization and subheading are intended to increase the readability. So, I express my thanks to Matt Perman for undertaking this creative and beneficial approach to Edwards’ classic work.

~ WDG

***

Preface

Being sensible that I am unable to do anything without God’s help, I do humbly entreat him by his grace to enable me to keep these Resolutions, so far as they are agreeable to his will, for Christ’s sake.

Remember to read over these Resolutions once a week.

Continue reading

A Call to the REAL World

Every call to worship is a call into the REAL WORLD.

I encounter such constant and widespread lying about reality each day and meet with such skilled and systematic distortion of the truth that I’m always in danger of losing my grip on reality.

  • The REALITY, of course, is that God is sovereign and Christ is savior.
  • The REALITY is that prayer is my mother tongue and the eucharist my basic food.
  • The REALITY is that baptism, not Myers-Briggs, defines who I am.”

~ Eugene Peterson

The Problem of Pretentious Piety

When Samuel Blair assumed the pulpit of Faggs Manor Church in 1740, he found a congregation in a spiritual condition not uncommon in our day. Blair wrote that when he came to the church he found “many good religious people who performed their religious obligation rather well”. Yet they were, in his estimation, somewhat formal and unenthusiastic:

If they performed these duties pretty punctually in their seasons and, as they thought, with good meaning, out of conscience, and not just to obtain a name for religion among men, then they were ready to conclude that they were truly and sincerely religious. A very lamentable ignorance of the main essentials of true practical religion, and the doctrines nearly relating thereunto very generally prevailed. The nature and necessity of the new birth was but litle known or thought of, the necessity of a conviction of sin and misery, by the Holy Spirit’s opening and applying the law to the conscience, in order to a saving closure with Christ, was hardly known at all to most. It was thought, that if there was any need of a heart-distressing sight of the soul’s danger, and fear of divine wrath, it was only needed for the grosser sort of sinners; and for any others to be deeply exercised this way (as might in some rare instances observable), this was generally looked upon to be a great evil and temptation that had befallen those persons. The common names for such soul-concern were, melancholy, trouble of mind, or despair. These terms were common, so far as I have been acquainted, indifferently used as synonymous; and trouble of mind was looked upon as a great evil, which all persons that made any sober profession and practice of religion ought carefully avoid. …There was scarcely any suspicion at all, in general, of any danger of depending upon self-righteousness, and not upon the righteousness of Christ alone for salvation. Papists [Roman Catholics] and Quakers would be readily acknowledeged guilty of this crime, but hardly any professed Presbyterian. The necessity of being first in Christ by a vital union, and in a justified state, before our religious services can be well pleasing and acceptable to God, was very little understood or thought of; but the common notion seemed to be, that if people were aiming to be in the way of duty as well as they could, at they imagined, there was no reason to be much afraid.

[Source: The Forming of an American Tradition: A Re-Examination of Colonial Presbyterianism, by Leonard J. Trinterud; Westminster Press, 1959; pp. 77-78]

Unfortunately, it seems that this same presumption still exists in too many congregations, and among too many professing Christians. Brennan Manning, in his thoughtful book, Ruthless Trust, identifies the problem with the superficial spirituality of pretentious piety:

In a world where the only plea is “Not Guilty”, what possibility is there of an honest encounter with Jesus, who “died for our sins”? We can only pretend that we are sinners, and thus only pretend that we are forgiven.

The Value of Ministries of Mercy

It seems that Micah 6.8 is quite clear and straight-forward in its summary of living as God’s People in this world:

He has shown you, O man, what is good.
    And what does the Lord require of you?
To do justice, and to love mercy,
    and to walk humbly with your God.

Yet, for some reason, many Christians, and too many churches, operate as if doing justice and mercy are components of some sort of optional deluxe Christianity plan – something for those who want to enlist in a branch of the spiritual special forces, but not something expected of every ordinary follower of Christ.

Tim Keller, in his textbook-like Center Church: Doing Balanced, Gospel-Centered Ministry in Your City, offers up some thoughts about the missional and evangelistic benefits of being faithful to what God “has shown us … is good”:

“Celebrate deeds of mercy and justice. We live in a time when public esteem of the church is plummeting. For many outsiders and inquirers, the deeds of the church will be far more important than our words in gaining plausibility (Acts 4:32–33). Leaders in most places see “word-only” churches as net costs to their community, organizations of relatively little value. But effective churches will be so involved in deeds of mercy and justice that outsiders will say, “We cannot do without churches like this. This church is channeling so much value into our community that if it were to leave the neighborhood, we would have to raise taxes.” Evangelistic worship services should highlight offerings for deed ministry and celebrate by the giving of reports, testimonies, and prayers. It is best that offerings for mercy ministries are received separately from the regular offering; they can be attached (as is traditional) to the celebration of the Lord’s Supper. This connection brings before the non-Christian the impact of the gospel on people’s hearts (i.e., the gospel makes us generous) and the impact of lives poured out for the world.”

The Spirituality I Want

“I want neither a terrorist spirituality that keeps me in a perpetual state of fright about being in a right relationship with my heavenly Father nor a sappy spirituality that portrays God as such a benign teddy bear that there is no aberrant behavior or desire of mine that he will not condone. I want a relationship with the Abba of Jesus, who is infinitely compassionate with my brokenness and at the same time an awesome, incomprehensible, and unwieldly Mystery.”

~ Brennan Manning, Ruthless Trust: The Ragamuffin’s Path to God

It’s Not An Escape Route

I have not looked up the social science data to back up my premise, but I strongly suspect that the pervasive perception of Evangelical Christianity – at least of American Evangelicals – is that we are far “more heavenly minded than of any earthly good.”

That’s a caricature, I know. But it is an understandable caricature. The influence of certain eschatalogical (i.e. “Last Things, or “End Times”) theories over the past one-hundred-plus years, and the corresponding popularity of fiction like the Left Behind series, has caused many people – both outside and inside the Church – to assume Christianity, or at least Evangelical Christianity, is more concerned about escaping this fallen and broken world than living redemptively in it.

But, even if I am accurate about my assumption of the perception of escapism, I do not believe that the perception itself is accurate. At least, it is not true of me; nor is it true of most of my friends.

Through the past several months, the church where I presently serve has been engaged in a sermon series study of the Book of Revelation, led mostly by my colleague, J.D. Funyak. Throughout this study I have been reminded, time and again, that the Bible really does not present us with an escapist mindset. Even the Book of Revelation, with all the apocalyptic imagery, when considered in proper context, paints a very real and down-to-earth picture of living life in this world. Therefore, since the Bible does not teach anything like an escapist mindset, Christianity does not – or should not – hold to any kind of escapist mindset.

As Christians, we are to develop our Worldview, our theological systems and theological emphases, and our corresponding practices, to be in accord with what is taught in the Scriptures. And the Scriptures do not teach us an escapist eschatology. Rather, I am convinced, that a proper biblical understanding of End Times is:

  • … more focused on preparing for Christ than for an anti-Christ;
  • … more focused on the Mark of the Lamb than the mark of the beast;
  • … more focused on engaging and preparing for the redeeming of the world than escaping it;
  • … and, more focused on Hope than fear.

For those who might want to explore a little more into this subject, I suggest the following articles:

A Guide for Personal Prayers of Confession

Perhaps the most common expression of a prayer of confession is the following:

Most merciful God, we confess that we have sinned against you in thought, word, and deed, by what we have done, and by what we have left undone. We have not loved you with our whole heart; we have not loved our neighbors as ourselves. We are truly sorry and we humbly repent. For the sake of your Son Jesus Christ have mercy on us and forgive us; that we may delight in your will, and walk in your ways, to the glory of your  Name. Amen.

The key elements in this prayer include:

  • Knowing who God is: “Most merciful God.” 
  • Acknowledging internal and external sins: “We confess that we have sinned against you in thought, word, and deed.”
  • Acknowledging sins of commission (doing what you shouldn’t): “By what we have done.”
  • Acknowledging sins of omission (not doing what you should have): “And by what we have left undone.”
  • Acknowledging sins against God: “We have not loved you with our whole heart.”
  • Acknowledging sins against our neighbor: “We have not loved our neighbors as ourselves.”
  • Expressing true remorse: “We are truly sorry and we humbly repent.”
  • Appealing to Christ’s work: “For the sake of your Son Jesus Christ, have mercy on us and forgive us.”
  • Resolving to change: “That we may delight in your will, and walk in your ways, to the glory of your Name. Amen.”

For those who might want to delve more deeply into the practice of Prayers of Confession, you might find the following books and articles to be of interest and benefit:

Thoughts of God

I appreciate Justin Taylor for causing me to consider two seeming conflicting perspectives from two 20th Century giants of the Christian faith: A.W. Tozer and C.S. Lewis:

A. W. Tozer, from The Knowledge of the Holy:

What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us.

The history of mankind will probably show that no people has ever risen above its religion, and man’s spiritual history will positively demonstrate that no religion has ever been greater than its idea of God. Worship is pure or base as the worshiper entertains high or low thoughts of God.

For this reason the gravest question before the Church is always God Himself, and the most portentous fact about any man is not what he at a given time may say or do, but what he in his deep heart conceives God to be like.

We tend by a secret law of the soul to move toward our mental image of God. This is true not only of the individual Christian, but of the company of Christians that composes the Church. Always the most revealing thing about the Church is her idea of God.

C.S. Lewis, from The Weight of Glory:

I read in a periodical the other day that the fundamental thing is how we think of God.

By God Himself, it is not! How God thinks of us is not only more important, but infinitely more important. Indeed, how we think of Him is of no importance except in so far as it is related to how He thinks of us.

It is written that we shall “stand before” Him, shall appear, shall be inspected. The promise of glory is the promise, almost incredible and only possible by the work of Christ, that some of us, that any of us who really chooses, shall actually survive that examination, shall find approval, shall please God. To please God . . . to be a real ingredient in the divine happiness . . . to be loved by God, not merely pitied, but delighted in as an artist delights in his work or a father in a son—it seems impossible, a weight or burden of glory which our thoughts can hardly sustain. But so it is.

Are these thoughts contradictory of one another? If not, how do we reconcile them? And assuming these statements can be reconciled, and shown not to be contradicting, what wisdom can the Christian gain that might shape the way we live?

Some things for me to think about.

Exposing Injustice & Creative Non-Violence

In light of the seeming incessant increase of social and political tension, acrimony, and even violence, I find this thought from the folks at The Bible Project on how Jesus wants his followers to respond to injustice and injustices – both real and perceived – to be a worthwhile reminder:

“Jesus invites his followers to expose and challenge injustice in creative and nonviolent ways. The examples Jesus shares are specific to the first century, and we are invited to use wisdom to find creative ways to stand our ground and expose the wrong while not mistreating others. Creative nonviolence exposes injustice while creating opportunities for restoration. It is an effective and generous way to respond to injustice that reveals the love and peace of God’s kingdom.”

Insights Into Ecclesiastes

As I read through and study Solomon’s Book of Ecclesiastes, for personal enlightenment rather than for preparation to teach, I appreciate the insights offered by Douglas Wilson, through his book Joy At the End of the Tether: The Inscrutable Wisdom of Ecclesiastes.

First, I appreciate the “scaffolding” Wilson identifies – the two great refrains that run throughout the book. Wilson notes:

Throughout the book, two great refrains can be heard. When we come to understand the meaning of these refrains, we will then know that the meaning of life cannot be found by fumbling in the dark. Instead of viewing the book as a series of disjointed and sometimes contradictory statements, we must first listen for those themes which integrate all the teaching of the entire book.

In other words, for us to understand the message of Ecclesiastes, we must recognize both of these refrains, understand what each means, and recognize how these two refrains relate to one another. What are these two themes?

  • “Under the Sun”
  • “The Great Gift of God”.

As one who benefits from outlines when I read and study, I also appreciate the simple outline Wilson sketches. Wilson writes:

Ecclesiastes has four basic sections, or divisions. In the first, Ecclesiastes 1.2 – 2.26, we see that Solomon’s experience shows that satisfaction cannot come from anything within the power or competence of man. In chapters 3.1-5.20, he shows that God is sovereign over everything. He then goes on to answer objections to this (perennially offensive) doctrine. Third, Ecclesiastes 6.1-8.15 carefully applies this doctrine that the sovereign God alone gives the power to enjoy this parade of vanity. Without an understanding of the Almighty, and without seeing his attributes, nature, and character, the world is nothing but an ongoing vexation of spirit. And finally, Ecclesiastes 8.16-12.14 removes various obstacles and discouragements, and addresses numerous practical concerns.

So, this outline of Ecclesiastes, as I paraphrase it:

  • Ecclesiastes 1.2 – 2.26: Reasons for Dissatisfactions and Frustrations in Life
  • Ecclesiastes 3.1 – 5.20: The Reality of the Sovereignty of God
  • Ecclesiastes 6.1 – 8.15: Why God’s Sovereignty is the Key to Our Satisfaction & Joy
  • Ecclesiastes 8.16 – 12.14: Practical Practices for Living a Life of Satisfaction & Joy

Just a few notes of things helping me to appreciate the wisdom of Solomon.