Gospel in Word and/or Deed

 

For the past couple of days I’ve been involved in a discussion on Justin Taylor’s blog, Between Two Worlds.  The discussion was prompted when Justin posted a Tweeted quote from J.D. Greear:

“Preach the Gospel; if necessary, use words” is like saying: “Tell me your phone number, if necessary use digits.”

Greear’s clever and pithy defense of the importance of preaching and substantive evangelism is set up as opposite of the quote famously attributed to Francis of Assisi:

“Preach the Gospel, and if necessary use words.”

The original quote, whether by Francis or not, is intended to express the importance of Gospel-driven actions.  However, it is also a quote that has often been associated with those who promote a Social Gospel – an attempt to meet tangible needs, often with little or no concern for regeneration, conversion, or spiritual transformation.

The conversation includes people who both agree and disagree with Greear.  As one who wants to see both Word & Deed – who believes both Word & Deed are necessary to properly reflect the ministry of Christ and the Kingdom of God – I have really appreciated comments from all sides.

I will not restate my comments in this discussion in this post.  If you are interested, you can check them out for yourself.  But I will say, for those who choose to check it out, my comments are slanted toward one side of this discussion in a way that does not completely reflect my more holistic view.  But, when I first commented, one side far out-numbered the other.

To check out or join the discussion, click: A Wordless Gospel.

McGwire Got the “Point”

So Mark McGwire has admitted to using steroids during his playing days.  No! You don’t say?!  Next someone will tell me that O.J. Simpson was not a Ward Cleaver-like husband.  What would be next after that?

Actually I am glad McGwire finally came clean.  But I don’t think I believe he has offered complete disclosure. For instance:

I am not sure I can buy as fact that his sole motive was the medicinal value.  McGwire stated that he began using steroids during a stint on the DL, hoping that they would help him recover more quickly. Ostensibly he continued to use them both to recover from the nicks and pains of the long seasons and as a preventative measure against further injuries. 

Even if that was the initial motive, Mark, at no time during usage did you ever consider the competitive advantages?  PLEASE!

Secondly, when asked if he thought he would have hit the requisite number of homers to break Roger Maris’ single season record had he not been on steroids, McGwire offered a lame, indefinite response. In effect, he said: “I had good seasons and bad seasons when I used steroids. I had good seasons and bad seasons when I did not use steroids.” 

One way to measure the effect, Mark, might be to take your 3 best HR seasons into consideration, and tell us if you were on the juice during those seasons.  If the answer is “Yes”, then I think you might safely surmise that your performance was supplemented.

My questions aside, I am glad McGwire has made the admission.  He has apparently got the point (needle pun intended) that American sports fans are often more willing to overlook the indiscretions of those they believe are forthcoming.  Maybe Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens will soon follow. 

Now, go ahead, put McGwire in the Hall of Fame. Let’s put this all behind us and move on.

There is a real sense I am not sure I care that he was on steroids. At least not from a baseball standpoint.  The fact is, while people talk about his “cheating”, there was no rule against using steroids in Major League Baseball

I am not being soft on steroids. I am glad that professional sports are cracking down on these synthetic performance enhancers.  But, in short, if he didn’t break the rules, he should not be excluded from the fraternity. 

While it is questionable that he would have had HOF numbers apart from the drugs, let’s get real: It is a Hall of FAME, not sacred post. And few players have ever been as famous for their play – legal play, mind you – as McGwire was during the late ’90’s.

If someone needs to be hung in effigy, it seems to me it ought to be Baseball Commish Bud Selig.  He knew full well what was going on around the league, but chose to look the other way AND keep the performance enhancers legal. And more recently he has violated promised immunity to players who willingly submitted to drug tests so that MLB could ascertain the extent of the steroid epidemic. 

Selig is the snake. 

McGwire and the other players were just stupid.